Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.649
Filtrar
2.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(1-2): 57-61, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316483

RESUMO

METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed of actual and predicted (Holt-Winters modelling) semaglutide and dulaglutide prescriptions supplied by the Australian PBS and Repatriation PBS in 2021-22. RESULTS: Semaglutide prescriptions decreased by 17% in March - September 2022, whereas dulaglutide prescriptions increased by 53% in April - July 2022 before decreasing by 17% in August - September 2022. There were 119,069 fewer semaglutide and 31,953 more dulaglutide prescriptions supplied than predicted in April - July and June - July 2022, respectively. DISCUSSION: Changes in semaglutide and dulaglutide T2D prescription patterns in 2022 coincided with supply shortages. General practitioners are encouraged to continue to prescribe semaglutide and dulaglutide for their appropriate indication and support patients with alternative treatments during the shortage.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Hipoglicemiantes , Humanos , Austrália , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/análogos & derivados , Hipoglicemiantes/provisão & distribuição , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Drug Saf ; 47(1): 59-70, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995048

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prior molecular modelling analysis identified several medicines as potential inhibitors of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) which may contribute to development or progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study investigates 40 medicines (index medicines) for signals of COPD development or progression in a real-world dataset. METHODS: Sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) was conducted using a 10% extract of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims data between January 2013 and September 2019. Patients must have been initiated on an index medicine and a medicine for COPD development or progression within 12 months of each other. Sequence ratios were calculated as the number of patients who initiated an index medicine followed by a medicine for COPD development or progression divided by the number who initiated the index medicine second. An adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) was calculated which accounted for changes in prescribing trends. Adverse drug event signals (ADEs) were identified where the aSR lower 95% confidence interval (CI) was greater than 1. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 40 (53%) index medicines had at least one ADE signal of COPD development or progression. Signals of COPD development, as identified using initiation of tiotropium, were observed for atenolol (aSR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.42) and naproxen (aSR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23). Several signals of COPD progression were observed, including initiation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol following initiation of atenolol (aSR 1.44, 95% CI 1.30-1.60) and initiation of aclidinium/formoterol following initiation of naproxen (aSR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34-3.65). CONCLUSION: ADE signals were generated for several potential GPx1 inhibitors; however, further validation of signals is required in large well-controlled observational studies.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Inibidores Enzimáticos , Glutationa Peroxidase GPX1 , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Glutationa Peroxidase GPX1/antagonistas & inibidores , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Austrália , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença
6.
J Surg Oncol ; 128(8): 1235-1242, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37653689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lack of evidence-based guidelines for postoperative opioid prescriptions following breast reconstruction contributes to a wide variation in prescribing practices and increases potential for misuse and abuse. METHODS: Between August and December 2019, women who underwent outpatient breast reconstruction were surveyed 7-10 days before (n = 97) and after (n = 101) implementing a standardized opioid prescription reduction initiative. We compared postoperative opioid use, pain control, and refills in both groups. Patient reported outcomes were compared using the BREAST-Q physical wellbeing of the chest domain and a novel symptom Recovery Tracker. RESULTS: Before changes in prescriptions, patients were prescribed a median of 30 pills and consumed three pills (interquartile range [IQR: 1,9]). After standardization, patients were prescribed eight pills and consumed three pills (IQR: 1,6). There was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of patients experiencing moderate to very severe pain on the Recovery Tracker or in the early BREAST-Q physical wellbeing of the chest scores (p = 0.8 and 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Standardizing and reducing opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery is feasible and can significantly decrease the number of excess pills prescribed. The was no adverse impact on early physical wellbeing, although larger studies are needed to obtain further data.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Mamoplastia , Dor Pós-Operatória , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Feminino , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 30(5): 365-370, 2023 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37598348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians atrial fibrillation (AF) checklist advises that emergency physicians initiate anticoagulation therapy for patients with AF or flutter who are CHADS65 positive. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare anticoagulation initiation rates between patients treated with and without an anticoagulation assessment pathway (the SAFE pathway). DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: All emergency department patients were discharged home with a diagnosis of AF between June 2018 and May 2020 at two Canadian emergency departments. INTERVENTION: The SAFE pathway is a hard copy form which allows emergency physicians to document contraindications to anticoagulation, the positive components of the CHADS65 score, and details how to prescribe anticoagulation. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: Trained researchers abstracted data on the use of the SAFE pathway by the presence or absence of the completed, scanned pathway in the electronic medical chart. The exposure of interest was use of this pathway. Patients were followed forward in time for 90 days by electronic medical record review to document stroke, transient ischemic attack, arterial embolism and major bleeding events. All events were independently adjudicated. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated to compare outcomes between those managed with and without the SAFE pathway. RESULTS: In total, 766 patients were included, of whom 264 were already taking anticoagulation, 166 were CHADS65 negative and 65 had a contraindication to anticoagulation, leaving 271 patients eligible for anticoagulation prescription. Among the 271 eligible patients, 137/166 managed with the SAFE pathway were initiated on anticoagulation and 24/105 managed without the SAFE pathway started anticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio 25.9; 13.1-51.2). There was no statistically significant difference in the 90-day rate of stroke or bleeding. CONCLUSION: Use of the SAFE pathway was associated with a higher rate of anticoagulation prescription.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilação Atrial , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Canadá , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medição de Risco , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
9.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 56(4): 149-153, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37285910

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Z-drugs are nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics used for sleep initiation and maintenance; these drugs increase the risk of fall-related injuries in older adults. The American Geriatrics Society's Beers criteria classifies Z-drugs as high-risk and strongly recommends avoiding prescribing Z-drugs to older adults due to adverse effects. The study objectives were to determine the prevalence of Z-drug prescribing among Medicare Part D patients and identify state or specialty-dependent prescribing differences. This study also aimed to determine prescribing patterns of Z-drugs to Medicare patients. METHODS: Z-drug prescription data was extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services State Drug Utilization Data for 2018. For all 50 states, the number of prescriptions per 100 Medicare enrollees and days-supply per prescription was determined. The percentage of total prescriptions prescribed by each specialty and the average number of prescriptions per provider within each specialty was also determined. RESULTS: Zolpidem was the most prescribed Z-drug (95.0%). Prescriptions per 100 enrollees were significantly high in Utah (28.2) and Arkansas (26.7) and significantly low in Hawaii (9.3) relative to the national average (17.5). Family medicine (32.1%), internal medicine (31.4%), and psychiatry (11.7%) made up the largest percentages of total prescriptions. The number of prescriptions per provider was significantly high among psychiatrists. DISCUSSION: Contrary to the Beers criteria, Z-drugs are prescribed to older adults at high rates.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Medicare Part D , Zolpidem , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Zolpidem/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Genéricos/provisão & distribuição , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 35(8): 512-518, 2023 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37167595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke discharge care bundles have been proposed to address inadequate provider statin prescription rates. LOCAL PROBLEM: Discontinuation of statins has been associated with a 37% relative risk increase in mortality in patients with a stroke diagnosis. The project site had a statin prescription rate of 86.2%. METHODS: The project was initiated at a 641-bed regional community teaching medical center. Statin prescription rates upon discharge on patients with the diagnosis of transient ischemic attack or stroke were evaluated and noted to be below the benchmark of 95%. Possible interventions to improve this benchmark were discussed with key stakeholders such as the information technology team, stroke care outcomes team, and neurology service providers. The proposed intervention was incorporated into the electronic health record. Provider prescription rates were tracked monthly along with the use of the proposed intervention. A one-sided z-test was used to analyze the data collected. INTERVENTIONS: A stroke discharge power plan within an electronic health record was modified to increase the rate of statin prescriptions. The key modification included checking off the prescription of a statin on discharge. Reinforcement of its use was done through monthly reminders. RESULTS: Use of discharge care plan yielded 100% compliance. Overall compliance was 9.7%. The null hypothesis of the one-sided z-test was 89%. The p -value for all tests was <0.05. CONCLUSION: The use of a stroke discharge care plan within an electronic health record can positively affect secondary stroke prevention by increasing statin prescription rates.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Alta do Paciente , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle
11.
Chest ; 164(3): 596-605, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the low rate of bacterial coinfection, antibiotics are very commonly prescribed in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the use of a procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic protocol safely reduce the use of antibiotics in patients with a COVID-19 infection? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter cohort, three groups of patients with COVID-19 were compared in terms of antibiotic consumption, namely one group treated based on a PCT-algorithm in one hospital (n = 216) and two control groups, consisting of patients from the same hospital (n = 57) and of patients from three similar hospitals (n = 486) without PCT measurements during the same period. The primary end point was antibiotic prescription in the first week of admission. RESULTS: Antibiotic prescription during the first 7 days was 26.8% in the PCT group, 43.9% in the non-PCT group in the same hospital, and 44.7% in the non-PCT group in other hospitals. Patients in the PCT group had lower odds of receiving antibiotics in the first 7 days of admission (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66 compared with the same hospital; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62 compared with the other hospitals). The proportion of patients receiving antibiotic prescription during the total admission was 35.2%, 43.9%, and 54.5%, respectively. The PCT group had lower odds of receiving antibiotics during the total admission only when compared with the other hospitals (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.63). There were no significant differences in other secondary end points, except for readmission in the PCT group vs the other hospitals group. INTERPRETATION: PCT-guided antibiotic prescription reduces antibiotic prescription rates in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, without major safety concerns.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Pró-Calcitonina , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos Clínicos
13.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 278, 2023 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081408

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited consensus regarding the optimal treatment of insomnia. The recent introduction of orexin receptor antagonists (ORA) has increased the available treatment options. However, the prescribing patterns of hypnotics in Japan have not been comprehensively assessed. We performed analyses of a claims database to investigate the real-world use of hypnotics for treating insomnia in Japan. METHODS: Data were retrieved for outpatients (aged ≥ 20 to < 75 years old) prescribed ≥ 1 hypnotic for a diagnosis of insomnia between April 1st, 2009 and March 31st, 2020, with ≥ 12 months of continuous enrolment in the JMDC Claims Database. Patients were classified as new or long-term users of hypnotics. Long-term use was defined as prescription of the same mechanism of action (MOA) for ≥ 180 days. We analyzed the trends (2010-2019) and patterns (2018-2019) in hypnotics prescriptions. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 130,177 new and 91,215 long-term users (2010-2019). Most new users were prescribed one MOA per year (97.1%-97.9%). In 2010, GABAA-receptor agonists (benzodiazepines [BZD] or z-drugs) were prescribed to 94.0% of new users. Prescriptions for BZD declined from 54.8% of patients in 2010 to 30.5% in 2019, whereas z-drug prescriptions remained stable (~ 40%). Prescriptions for melatonin receptor agonist increased slightly (3.2% to 6.3%). Prescriptions for ORA increased over this time from 0% to 20.2%. Prescriptions for BZD alone among long-term users decreased steadily from 68.3% in 2010 to 49.7% in 2019. Prescriptions for ORA were lower among long-term users (0% in 2010, 4.3% in 2019) relative to new users. Using data from 2018-2019, multiple (≥ 2) MOAs were prescribed to a higher proportion of long-term (18.2%) than new (2.8%) users. The distribution of MOAs according to psychiatric comorbidities, segmented by age or sex, revealed higher proportions of BZD prescriptions in elderly (new and long-term users) and male (new users) patients in all comorbidity segments. CONCLUSION: Prescriptions for hypnotics among new and long-term users in Japan showed distinct patterns and trends. Further understanding of the treatment options for insomnia with accumulating evidence for the risk-benefit balance might be beneficial for physicians prescribing hypnotics in real-world settings.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Indutores do Sono , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , População do Leste Asiático , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Japão/epidemiologia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores de Melatonina/agonistas , Agonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Orexina/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Indutores do Sono/uso terapêutico
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37069844

RESUMO

Background: The clinical guideline recommends use of long-acting ß2 agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) or long-acting ß2 agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) combination therapies for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhalers of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS were reimbursed in Taiwan in 2015 and in 2002, respectively. This study aimed to examine prescription patterns of new use of either FDC therapy in real-world practice. Methods: We identified COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC between 2015 and 2018 from a population-based Taiwanese database with 2 million, randomly sampled beneficiaries enrolled in a single-payer health insurance system. We compared number of LABA/LAMA FDC and LABA/ICS FDC initiators in each calendar year, from different hospital accreditation levels, and cared for by different physician specialties. We also compared baseline patient characteristics between LABA/LAMA FDC and LABA/ICS FDC initiators. Results: A total of 12,455 COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC (n=4019) or LABA/ICS FDC (n=8436) were included. Number of LABA/LAMA FDC initiators increased apparently (n=336 in 2015 versus n=1436 in 2018), but number of LABA/ICS FDC initiators decreased obviously (n=2416 in 2015 versus n=1793 in 2018) over time. The preference of use of LABA/LAMA FDC varied across clinical environments. The proportions of LABA/LAMA FDC initiators were more than 30% in the setting of non-primary care clinics (eg, medical centers) and in the services of chest physicians; but were only less than 10% in primary care clinics and non-chest physicians' services (eg, family medicine physicians). LABA/LAMA FDC initiators appeared to be older, male, to have more comorbidities, and to utilize resources more frequently compared to LABA/ICS FDC initiators. Conclusion: This real-world study found evident temporal trends, variations in healthcare provider, and differences in patient characteristics among COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2 , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação de Medicamentos
15.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 97, 2023 03 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991313

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The current opioid epidemic poses patient safety and economic burdens to healthcare systems worldwide. Postoperative prescriptions of opioids contribute, with reported opioid prescription rates following arthroplasty as high as 89%. In this multi-centre prospective study, an opioid sparing protocol was implemented for patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome is to report our patient outcomes in the context of this protocol, and to examine the rate of opioid prescription on discharge from our hospitals following joint arthroplasty surgery. This is possibly associated with the efficacy of the newly implemented Arthroplasty Patient Care Protocol. METHODS: Over three years, patients underwent perioperative education with the expectation to be opioid-free after surgery. Intraoperative regional analgesia, early postoperative mobilisation and multimodal analgesia were mandatory. Long-term opioid medication use was monitored and PROMs (Oxford Knee/Hip Score (OKS/OHS), EQ-5D-5 L) were evaluated pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Primary and secondary outcomes were opiate use and PROMs at different time points. RESULTS: A total of 1,444 patients participated. Two (0.2%) knee patients used opioids to one year. Zero hip patients used opioids postoperatively at any time point after six weeks (p < 0.0001). The OKS and EQ-5D-5 L both improved for knee patients from 16 (12-22) pre-operatively to 35 (27-43) at 1 year postoperatively, and 70 (60-80) preoperatively to 80 (70-90) at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The OHS and EQ-5D-5 L both improved for hip patients from 12 (8-19) preoperatively to 44 (36-47) at 1 year postoperatively, and 65 (50-75) preoperatively to 85 (75-90) at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Satisfaction improved between all pre- and postoperative time points for both knee and hip patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Knee and hip arthroplasty patients receiving a peri-operative education program can effectively and satisfactorily be managed without long-term opioids when coupled with multimodal perioperative management, making this a valuable approach to reduce chronic opioid use.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 25(97)ene.- mar. 2023. ilus, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-218375

RESUMO

Introducción: el raquitismo es un problema de salud a nivel global. La deficiencia de vitamina D se ha convertido en una pandemia, su interés ha aumentado por la implicación de la misma en múltiples acciones extraesqueléticas. Material y métodos: se realizó una encuesta a través de correo electrónico entre pediatras españoles para estudiar su actitud en relación con la suplementación profiláctica de vitamina D. Resultados: un 83% de los pediatras tienen políticas de profilaxis de vitamina D en su área. Un 61,6% inicia la profilaxis en las dos primeras semanas y un 81,5% la mantiene el primer año. Un 57,2% realiza una búsqueda de deficiencia de vitamina D, sobre todo si trabajan en medio hospitalario. Conclusiones: las políticas de profilaxis con vitamina D son bastantes uniformes. Más de la mitad de los pediatras españoles realizan una búsqueda sistemática mediante analítica de deficiencia de vitamina D en sus pacientes con factores de riesgo durante la infancia y adolescencia (AU)


Introduction: rickets is a global health problem. Vitamin D deficiency has become a pandemic, its interest has increased due to its implication in multiple extraskeletal actions.Material and methods: a survey was conducted by e-mail among spanish paediatricians to study their attitude regarding prophylactic vitamin D supplementation.Results: 83% of pediatricians have vitamin D prophylaxis policies in their area. 61.6% start prophylaxis in the first two weeks, 81.5% maintain it the first year. 57.2% search for vitamin D deficiency, especially if they work in a hospital.Conclusions: vitamin D prophylaxis policies are uniform. More than a half of Spanish pediatricians conduct a systematic search for vitamin D deficiency in their patients with risk factors during childhood and adolescence (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Raquitismo/prevenção & controle , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Espanha
17.
JAMA ; 329(1): 52-62, 2023 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36594946

RESUMO

Importance: Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) is currently the guideline-recommended first-line treatment for HIV. Delayed prescription of INSTI-containing ART may amplify differences and inequities in health outcomes. Objectives: To estimate racial and ethnic differences in the prescription of INSTI-containing ART among adults newly entering HIV care in the US and to examine variation in these differences over time in relation to changes in treatment guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective observational study of 42 841 adults entering HIV care from October 12, 2007, when the first INSTI was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, to April 30, 2019, at more than 200 clinical sites contributing to the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design. Exposures: Combined race and ethnicity as reported in patient medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Probability of initial prescription of ART within 1 month of care entry and probability of being prescribed INSTI-containing ART. Differences among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients were estimated by calendar year and time period in relation to changes in national guidelines on the timing of treatment initiation and recommended initial treatment regimens. Results: Of 41 263 patients with information on race and ethnicity, 19 378 (47%) as non-Hispanic Black, 6798 (16%) identified as Hispanic, and 13 539 (33%) as non-Hispanic White; 36 394 patients (85%) were male, and the median age was 42 years (IQR, 30 to 51). From 2007-2015, when guidelines recommended treatment initiation based on CD4+ cell count, the probability of ART initiation within 1 month of care entry was 45% among White patients, 45% among Black patients (difference, 0% [95% CI, -1% to 1%]), and 51% among Hispanic patients (difference, 5% [95% CI, 4% to 7%]). From 2016-2019, when guidelines strongly recommended treating all patients regardless of CD4+ cell count, this probability increased to 66% among White patients, 68% among Black patients (difference, 2% [95% CI, -1% to 5%]), and 71% among Hispanic patients (difference, 5% [95% CI, 1% to 9%]). INSTIs were prescribed to 22% of White patients and only 17% of Black patients (difference, -5% [95% CI, -7% to -4%]) and 17% of Hispanic patients (difference, -5% [95% CI, -7% to -3%]) from 2009-2014, when INSTIs were approved as initial therapy but were not yet guideline recommended. Significant differences persisted for Black patients (difference, -6% [95% CI, -8% to -4%]) but not for Hispanic patients (difference, -1% [95% CI, -4% to 2%]) compared with White patients from 2014-2017, when INSTI-containing ART was a guideline-recommended option for initial therapy; differences by race and ethnicity were not statistically significant from 2017-2019, when INSTI-containing ART was the single recommended initial therapy for most people with HIV. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults entering HIV care within a large US research consortium from 2007-2019, the 1-month probability of ART prescription was not significantly different across most races and ethnicities, although Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than White patients to receive INSTI-containing ART in earlier time periods but not after INSTIs became guideline-recommended initial therapy for most people with HIV. Additional research is needed to understand the underlying racial and ethnic differences and whether the differences in prescribing were associated with clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Infecções por HIV , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Antirretrovirais/administração & dosagem , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103752, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36586322

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The combined impact of variable surgeon prescribing preferences and low resident prescribing comfort level can lead to significant disparity in opioid prescribing patterns. We report an update on the expanded scope of this now 5-year, resident led initiative to standardize postoperative prescription practices within the Department of Otolaryngology. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, performed a retrospective review of 12 months before (July 2016 - June 2017) and 48 months after (July 2019-June 2021) implementation of the Expanded Postoperative Analgesia Protocol. The Pre-Protocol and Expanded Protocol cohorts were compared using ANOVA, chi-squared and Fisher Exact tests, with ANCOVA and binary logistic regression for covariate analysis. Cost impact was calculated using average medication spending data for 2018-2019. RESULTS: 470 patients were included in the Pre-Protocol cohort (54 % male, mean age 35 years) and 679 in the Expanded Protocol cohort (63 % male, mean age 36 years). The protocol was effectively implemented as reflected in the reduction of combination opioid medications from 429 (91.3 %) to 26 (3.8 %) (87 % reduction, 95 % CI 86 % to 89 %, p < .001). The protocol resulted in a 66 % reduction in average morphine milligram equivalents per patient (333 mg to 114 mg, mean reduction 219 mg, 95 % CI 206 mg to 232 mg, p < .001), a 68 % reduction in medication refills (refill rate 20 % to 6 %; 14 % reduction, 95 % CI 12 % to 16 %, p < .001) and a 74 % reduction in cost of postoperative medications ($93.82 to $24.64 per patient). CONCLUSION: Through purposeful standardization, this 5-year resident led effort resulted in sustained changes to departmental wide prescribing practices yielding reduced variability, reduced cost, improved opioid management and superior pain control for postoperative patients.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Internato e Residência
19.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 24(96)oct.- dic. 2022. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-214386

RESUMO

Introducción: el ondansetrón es un antiemético ampliamente utilizado en la práctica clínica para el control de vómitos asociados a gastritis y/o gastroenteritis aguda en niños. Sin embargo, la evidencia disponible es controvertida, sus indicaciones no están claramente definidas y no existe una unanimidad de uso en las guías de práctica clínica. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo en el que se incluyó un total de 825 niños entre 0 y 14 años con vómitos asociados a gastritis y/o gastroenteritis aguda que acudieron a Urgencias de Pediatría de un hospital terciario durante el año 2019. Se analizó la asociación entre el uso de ondansetrón y la necesidad de rehidratación intravenosa, las hospitalizaciones, el tiempo de permanencia en Urgencias y las nuevas consultas a Urgencias dentro de las 72 horas posteriores. Resultados: de la muestra estudiada, el 38,8% de los pacientes recibieron ondansetrón. La administración de ondansetrón redujo el riesgo de ingreso (OR 0,19; IC 95%: 0,04-0,84) y disminuyó el tiempo de permanencia en Urgencias (p = 0,000). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la reducción de la necesidad de rehidratación intravenosa (OR 0,65; IC 95%: 0,40-1,05) ni en las nuevas visitas a Urgencias dentro de las 72 horas siguientes (OR 1,38; IC 95%: 0,82-2,31). Conclusiones: nuestros resultados sugieren que el uso de ondansetrón podría ser beneficioso en niños mayores de 6 meses con vómitos asociados a gastritis y/o gastroenteritis aguda y que presenten deshidratación de leve a moderada (AU)


Background: ondansetron is an antiemetic widely used in clinical practice for the control of vomiting associated with gastritis and/or acute gastroenteritis in children. However, the available evidence about its use is controversial, its directions for use are not clearly defined and there is no unanimity on its use in clinical practice guidelines.Methodology: we performed a retrospective cohort study which included a total of 825 children between 0 and 14 years, who presented symptoms of vomiting associated with gastritis and/or acute gastroenteritis and attended the Pediatric Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital in 2019. The association between the use of ondansetron and the need for intravenous rehydration, hospitalization, length of stay in the Pediatric Emergency Department and return visits to the emergency department within 72 hours was analysed.Results: of the sample studied, 38.7% of the patients received ondansetron. The administration of ondansetron reduced the risk of hospital admission (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84) and decreased the length of stay in the emergency department (p = 0.000). No significant differences were found in reducing the need for intravenous rehydration (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.05) or in return visits to emergency department within 3 days (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.82-2.31).Conclusions: our results suggest that the use of ondansetron could be beneficial in children older than 6 months with vomiting associated with gastritis and/or acute gastroenteritis and with mild-to-moderate dehydration. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Gastroenterite/tratamento farmacológico , Gastrite/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Ondansetron/administração & dosagem , Antieméticos/administração & dosagem , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos
20.
Rev. psiquiatr. Urug ; 86(2): 76-85, dic. 2022.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1412374

RESUMO

Los medicamentos en su formulación de depósito son utilizados como una intervención para la adherencia cuando se dificulta el cumplimiento vía oral. Es frecuente la baja adherencia a los tratamientos por vía oral en las personas con enfermedades crónicas. Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, de una muestra aleatorizada de los pacientes que reciben antipsicóticos de depósito, asistidos en la Policlínica del Hospital Vilardebó en el año 2014. El objetivo fue describir las características de la población que tiene prescripto antipsicótico de depósito en la consulta ambulatoria y conocer los hábitos prescriptivos de estos para favorecer su uso racional. La patología psiquiátrica más prevalente fue la esquizofrenia con 56,4 %, donde se usó con más frecuencia la pipotiazina, siendo este más oneroso que el tratamiento con haloperidol y con un perfil de seguridad y efectividad similar. No se encontraron diferencias entre el uso de anticolinérgicos para los efectos extrapiramidales. Más de dos tercios de los pacientes (69,7 %) estuvieron con polifarmacia antipsicótica y un cuarto de los pacientes (24,7 %) con más de 2 antipsicóticos, a pesar de que en las pautas internacionales no recomiendan tratamientos que justifiquen el uso de más de dos antipsicóticos, dado que no existe evidencia que avale esta práctica, además del riesgo aumentado de reacciones adversas. Un bajo porcentaje (20 %) recibió la medicación de depósito todos los meses del año, resultando de vital importancia evaluar en estudios posteriores las causas intervinientes.


Depot formulation drugs are used as an adherence intervention when oral adherence is difficult to achieve. Low adherence to oral drugs is commonly observed in people with chronic diseases. An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out on a randomized sample of patients receiving depot antipsychotics, treated at Hospital Vilardebó Outpatient Clinic in 2014. The aim was to describe this population's characteristics and prescription habits at the clinic in order to promote rational use. The most prevalent disorder was Schizophrenia (56.4%); pipothiazine was the most frequently used drug. It is more expensive than haloperidol with similar safety and efficacy profiles. There was no difference in the use of anticholinergic drugs to prevent extrapyramidal side effects. More than two thirds of the patients (69.7%) received antipsychotic polypharmacy and a fourth of the patients (24.7%) received more than two antipsychotics in spite of the fact that international treatment guides do not recommend the use of more than two because of lack of benefit evidence and increased risk of adverse reactions. Only 20 % of the patients received the depot every month of the year, being of vital importance to evaluate in subsequent studies the intervening causes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Uruguai , Amostragem Aleatória Simples , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Medicamentos , Distribuição por Sexo , Polimedicação , Assistência Ambulatorial , Octogenários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...